Democrats Don't Denounce Bigotry In Their Party
The bigoted wing of the Democrat Party is alive and well. Pelosi, Hoyer, Reid, Kennedy and Hillary all refuse to denounce it.
The apparent leader of the (openly) bigoted wing of the Democrat Party is the "Mauler" from Georgia-Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney. McKinney has it all-she hates Blacks, Jews and Republicans-the trifecta of bigotry. Sammy Davis Jr. might have given her a heart attack!
A few years ago a black woman defeated her in a Democrat primary-Cynthia went on to call her an "Oreo". What if a GOP'er had called the Rev; Jesse Jackson a huckster and jive master? We all know what would happen, the Republican Party would denounce the speaker and kill their political career.
Yet, what is the difference between McKinney using her office and web site to pronounce her bigotry and the Democrat Party claiming blacks are too dumb to get jobs, so we need to discriminate and create affirmative action programs? What is the difference between McKinney and the Democrat Party that believe's the only way woman can get government contracts is to have "set asides" for them-a guarantee of work? What difference is there between McKinney and UCLA-where every black and Hispanic student automatically gets a tutor, while white and Asian students must ask for one-UCLA believes blacks and Hispanic did not get into the school by hard work and good grades, just the color of their skin.
Is it any wonder that Hillary, Pelosi, Reid, Kennedy and their ilk are quiet about the bigotry of Cynthia McKinney? She announces her bigotry by words, they announce their bigotry by legislation. Some would call this the Bigots wing of the Democrat Party.
In light of that information, why should we give any credibility to Democrats who say that. To believe Democrats' claims, we'd have to believe that he was an honorable man who wouldn't know a if he saw one.
We'd have to not believe that Salman Pak wasn't a training facility. We'd have to not believe that Ansar al-Islam was a radical Islamic group. We'd have to believe that Abu Nidal, the man accused of attempting to murder Col. Oliver North, really wasn't "regarded as the world's most ruthless leader" during the late 70's and early 80's. We'd have to believe that Abu Abbas, the man who shot Leon Klinghoffer after finding out that the man in the wheelchair was Jewish, then threw him overboard after hijacking the Achille Lauro wasn't in Iraq at any time.
Forgive me if I don't believe any of that.
Despite serious differences on immigration policy, does anyone think that a Democrat-controlled House or Senate would vote to build a border fence? There isn't any doubt that there was a significant movement away from the GOP just prior to the nominating conventions. That's when it was true that there were significant numbers of conservatives who were dispirited. Now that we've looked over that precipice, we've sobered up. We've decided that casting 'protest votes' would be disastrous to the conservative movement and to the nation.
At the end of the day, I think we're in better shape because there's more "Nick in Daytona" voters than there are moonbat fringe voters.